The benefit of internal links is mixed across length segments. Short pages don't consistently gain more from links than long pages.
Bottom line: Internal links can help any length, but short pages do not win by default.
The x-axis groups pages by content length segments. Each group has bars showing relative impressions at different internal link levels. Compare bar heights within each length segment, not across segments. Look for consistent step-ups; mixed or flat bars mean links are not a reliable length-based advantage.
Many teams pour internal links into short pages to “boost” them fast. The idea is that thin pages need more help from site signals. Our data from millions of pages shows a mixed result by length segment. Short pages do not consistently get a bigger lift in relative impressions than longer pages.
Group them by topic and confirm each has a single primary query.
Place links in relevant sections and use specific anchors.
Add hub links so each target is within 3 clicks.
Keep links that correlate with lift and revert noisy changes.
Links from pages that already earn impressions pass more discoverability. If you link only from low-traffic pages, nothing new reaches Google.
This is usually enough to improve crawl paths and context without creating noise. If you overdo it, anchors compete and signals get muddy.
Use anchors that describe the destination in plain words. If anchors are generic, Google gets less topic clarity.
Shallow depth improves crawl frequency and equity flow. If depth is high, links may exist but still arrive too late.
You may waste time linking to pages that fail due to weak intent match, not link scarcity.
Sitewide links often add little context and can look like noise at scale.
Anchor repetition can reduce topical coverage and create internal cannibalization signals.
When a short page responds well to internal links, it is often a discovery problem, not a “short content” problem. Check server logs or crawl data for low Googlebot hits, then link from pages Google already crawls often.
All data comes from real websites tracked by SEOJuice. We use the latest snapshot per page so each page counts once, regardless of site size. We filter for pages with at least 10 Google Search Console impressions and valid ranking positions (1-100).
Data is refreshed weekly. Correlation does not imply causation — these insights show associations, not guaranteed outcomes.
We compared readability scores against relative impressions across 17K+ unique pages.
We analyzed word counts across 35K+ unique pages and compared relative impressions.
We measured how description-to-content consistency correlates with click-through rates.
SEOJuice tracks all these metrics automatically and helps you improve them.
Try SEOJuice Free
