Moz’s comparative authority metric is useful for benchmarking and prospecting, but it is not a Google ranking factor and breaks easily when overused.
Domain Authority is Moz’s 1-100 score that estimates how competitive a domain is in search based mostly on link signals. It matters because teams use it to benchmark link strength against competitors, qualify outreach targets, and explain authority gaps fast—even though Google does not use DA.
Domain Authority (DA) is a comparative SEO metric created by Moz that predicts how likely a domain is to perform in search relative to other domains. It is scored on a 1–100 logarithmic scale, where higher scores generally indicate stronger link profiles and greater ability to compete in search results.
The most important thing to understand is this: Domain Authority is not a Google ranking factor. Google representatives have repeatedly said that Google does not use a general “domain authority” score in its ranking systems. For example, Google Search Advocate John Mueller has said on multiple occasions that Google does not use Domain Authority as a metric. Moz also states plainly that DA is its own third-party metric, not a Google metric.
That does not make DA useless. In practice, it can still be a helpful shorthand for:
Used correctly, DA is a benchmarking tool, not a KPI to chase blindly.
Domain Authority was created by Moz. The company describes DA as a machine learning-based metric that predicts how well a domain may rank compared with others in the Moz index. Moz also offers a related page-level metric called Page Authority (PA).
Because Moz owns the metric, the exact score depends on Moz’s link index, model, and weighting, not on Google Search Console data or Ahrefs data. That is why the same site can have very different numbers across tools like Moz, Ahrefs, Semrush, and Majestic.
Moz explains that DA is calculated using multiple signals from its own link graph. While Moz does not publish every weighting detail, the score is broadly influenced by factors such as:
A few practical points matter here:
A DA score only makes sense in comparison with other sites. A score of 35 may be strong in one niche and weak in another. If you run a local plumbing site, DA 35 might be excellent. If you compete with Wikipedia, Amazon, or major publishers, DA 35 is modest.
Moving from DA 10 to 20 is usually much easier than moving from DA 70 to 80. As sites move higher on the scale, each incremental increase tends to require substantially stronger link equity.
Because DA is based on a comparative index and model, your score can rise or fall even if you did nothing. Moz may update its index, recrawl the web differently, or adjust the model. Competitors may also gain links faster than you do.
It estimates the overall comparative strength of a domain or subdomain, not whether a specific page deserves to rank for a specific query. Rankings still depend on many page-level and query-level factors such as relevance, intent match, content quality, internal linking, technical health, and SERP features.
No. Google does not use Moz Domain Authority as a ranking factor. That point is important enough to repeat because many SEO reports still imply otherwise.
If you want a named source, check Google guidance from representatives like John Mueller, who has consistently said that tools may create their own authority metrics, but those are not metrics Google uses internally. Google Search Console also does not provide a DA score.
However, DA often correlates loosely with ranking ability because it relies heavily on link signals, and links do matter in search. That correlation can mislead teams into treating DA like a direct cause. It is better to think of DA as an external estimate of competitive link strength, not a direct signal inside Google.
Even though DA is not a Google metric, it remains useful in several workflows.
If you compare your domain against a shortlist of real search competitors, DA can quickly show whether you are entering a SERP with a major link equity gap. It is not the full answer, but it is a fast directional signal.
Many outreach teams use DA to sort large prospect lists. For example, if you are reviewing 500 potential sites for digital PR or guest contribution, DA can help prioritize domains that are more likely to pass meaningful value. It should be combined with traffic quality, relevance, editorial standards, and spam checks.
A rising DA can suggest that your backlink profile is strengthening over time. A falling DA may indicate lost links, index shifts, or stronger competitors. In either case, it is a prompt to investigate, not a final diagnosis.
DA is a simple concept for non-specialists to grasp. Executives and clients often want one metric that summarizes competitive authority. DA can serve that role if you clearly explain its limits.
One common source of confusion is that every major SEO platform has its own authority metric.
These metrics are not interchangeable. They rely on different link indexes, crawlers, models, and definitions. A site with a high Ahrefs DR may not have equally high Moz DA, and vice versa.
That is why comparisons should usually stay within one tool, not across tools. If your outreach process uses Moz DA, benchmark everything in Moz. If your team reports on Ahrefs DR, keep the dataset inside Ahrefs.
Because DA is primarily link-driven, the strongest way to improve it is usually to earn better backlinks over time. In practical terms, that often means:
It is also worth cleaning up obvious technical issues that make links less effective, such as broken redirects, 404s on linked URLs, inconsistent canonicals, or fragmented versions of the same site.
Still, improving DA should not be the main objective. The real objective is usually better visibility, stronger rankings for valuable queries, and more qualified traffic or revenue. If those improve and DA lags, that is often acceptable.
There is no universal good DA score. It depends on your market.
A useful way to evaluate your score is to compare it with:
For example, if most sites ranking for your target terms fall between DA 25 and 40, then reaching the low end of that range may make you more competitive. If the SERP is dominated by major brands and government or publisher sites, DA alone may tell you the market is structurally difficult.
DA can be helpful, but it is easy to misuse.
A domain can have strong authority and still fail to rank for a query if the page is weak, irrelevant, outdated, or poorly optimized.
Topical relevance, search intent match, local signals, freshness, and superior content can allow a lower-DA site to outrank stronger domains for specific keywords.
You do not rank a domain; you rank a page. If the ranking page has poor internal links, weak content, or no useful external links, the domain’s overall DA may not matter much.
Teams sometimes buy links or chase high-DA placements without checking whether the site is actually relevant, indexed well, or trusted. That can waste budget and create risk.
If you want DA to be genuinely useful, use it as one input in a broader SEO process.
A sensible workflow looks like this:
For canonical guidance, start with:
Domain Authority is best understood as Moz’s comparative estimate of domain-level link authority. It is useful for benchmarking, prospecting, and spotting relative competitive strength. But it is not a Google metric, not a direct ranking factor, and not a substitute for deeper SEO analysis.
If you use it, use it with context: compare like with like, pair it with relevance and traffic data, and treat it as a directional signal rather than a goal in itself.
https://moz.com/learn/seo/domain-authority
What's happening: Moz defines Domain Authority as its own predictive metric and explains that it is best used as a comparative measure rather than a standalone SEO target. This is the primary source for what DA is and how Moz wants it interpreted.
What to do: Use this page as the canonical reference when explaining DA to clients or teammates. If someone treats DA like a Google score, point them here and restate that it is Moz’s metric based on Moz’s own index and model.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEYmXfI4Y7k
What's happening: Google Search Advocate John Mueller has publicly clarified that Google does not use third-party metrics like Domain Authority. While different videos and posts cover this theme, the underlying guidance is consistent: external tool scores are not Google ranking inputs.
What to do: Use Google representative statements to separate useful SEO benchmarking from Google ranking myths. In reports, label DA as a third-party authority estimate, not as a Google signal.
https://ahrefs.com/seo/glossary/domain-rating
What's happening: Ahrefs explains Domain Rating as its own domain-level backlink authority metric. Reviewing this alongside Moz’s DA documentation shows why two tools can score the same site differently and why cross-tool comparisons often create confusion.
What to do: If your team uses Ahrefs and Moz, document which metric belongs to which workflow. Compare competitors within one platform at a time instead of mixing DA and DR in the same ranking conclusion.
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/creating-helpful-content
What's happening: Google’s Search Central guidance emphasizes helpful, people-first content and broader quality principles rather than any public domain authority score. This illustrates that rankings depend on much more than off-page authority estimates.
What to do: Use this resource to keep DA in perspective. If rankings are weak, do not assume the fix is always more links; review content quality, search intent alignment, and technical accessibility as well.
| Tool | Metric | Scope | Main use | Key caution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moz | Domain Authority (DA) | Domain or subdomain | Benchmark competitive link strength | Not a Google metric; relative to Moz’s index |
| Moz | Page Authority (PA) | Single page | Estimate page-level ranking potential | Still third-party and comparative |
| Ahrefs | Domain Rating (DR) | Domain backlink profile | Compare link profile strength in Ahrefs | Cannot be mapped directly to DA |
| Semrush | Authority Score | Domain-level composite metric | High-level domain evaluation | Uses different inputs and model from Moz |
| Majestic | Trust Flow / Citation Flow | Domain or URL | Assess trust and link quantity patterns | Best interpreted within Majestic, not across tools |
✅ Better approach: A very common mistake is reporting Domain Authority as if it were a score from Google or something Google directly uses in rankings. That creates confusion with clients and internal teams. DA comes from Moz, and while it may correlate with link strength, it is not a Google Search Console metric and not a ranking factor.
✅ Better approach: People often compare their site’s DA with huge publishers or national brands that are not true search competitors. This makes the metric feel discouraging or misleading. DA works better when you compare domains competing for the same queries, audience, and market conditions rather than using broad internet-wide vanity comparisons.
✅ Better approach: If you only chase high-DA websites for backlinks, you may ignore relevance, editorial integrity, organic traffic quality, and audience fit. That can lead to wasted outreach, overpriced placements, or risky link sources. A lower-DA site in the exact niche can be much more useful than a stronger but irrelevant domain.
✅ Better approach: Small DA movements are often overinterpreted. Because Moz updates its index and model, a score can change without any dramatic event on your site. Looking only at the score may cause teams to react to noise. It is better to pair DA changes with referring domain trends, ranking performance, and actual organic traffic outcomes.
✅ Better approach: A strong domain does not automatically mean every page on the site can rank well. Many SEO decisions fail because teams overvalue domain-level authority and undervalue whether the actual page satisfies search intent. Rankings happen at the page and query level, so DA should never replace content, internal linking, and on-page analysis.
✅ Better approach: Moz DA, Ahrefs DR, Semrush Authority Score, and Majestic metrics are often treated as if they were interchangeable. They are not. Each platform has its own crawler and methodology. If you mix them carelessly in one report, you can create contradictions that are not actionable and make stakeholder communication harder.
Get expert SEO insights and automated optimizations with our platform.
Get Started Free